7 August 2020
A Matter of Trust: Implied Trusts & Capital Disposals

When looking at the capital gains tax (CGT) position following a disposal of an asset, it is important to understand that CGT follows the beneficial interest in the property (as opposed to the legal title).
Establishing the owner(s) of the beneficial interest should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The case of Asif Bhikhi v HMRC (2020) demonstrates the importance of properly documenting transfers of property which can often be overlooked in transactions between family members. In this case, the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) held that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the appellant retained their beneficial ownership of a property on a transfer. In any case, even if there had been an implied trust in place, the transfer of the legal interest in the property would nevertheless have been treated as a disposal for capital gains purposes.
The Facts
- Asif Bhikhi (the appellant) and his brother Sajid acquired a property at in 2001.
- In 2012, both Asif and Sajid were were convicted of fraud and subject to penalties from the Crown Prosecution Service of £212,861 each.
- Due to the order they were unable to mortgage the property to raise the funds required to meet this obligation, so they entered into an agreement with their relative Irfan, under which the property would be transferred to a company he owned (MIS) for consideration of £499,000. These funds were to be raised by MIS mortgaging the property.
- It was agreed that Asif and Sajid would continue to manage the property, but would pass the rents to MIS to meet the mortgage payments. During this period, the property was shown on MIS's balance sheet and it paid tax on the rental profits.
- Asif did not declare a capital gain on the sale of the property, claiming that only legal title had been transferred and he and his brother Sajid had retained the beneficial ownership of the property.
- HMRC raised a discovery assessment in relation to the 2012/13 tax year on the basis that the transfer was a disposal for CGT purposes and charged a penalty for an inaccuracy in a tax return.
- Land registry form TR1 - the box for 'declaration of trust' had been left blank
- A letter from 2012 by the solicitors acting for the brothers which referred to the transfer as a 'sale'
- A conveyancing agreement which incorporated the standard conditions of sale
- A letter from 2016 signed by Ifran as director of MIS which stated the company held the property on implied trust for Asif and Sajid, who would be entitled to all capital profits and remain responsible for upkeep and maintenance.